I have used FL Studio and it's audio quality is fine.Īlthough the link provided is a bit debatable in some areas, it is mostly fine too. I suppose if I was convinced it was inferior I might consider switching to a different DAW. So I guess the only question is about the sound engine quality, is there any proof that it is inferior? How can this be tested? I would really like to find this out because all I really hear is 'oh, yeah my friend who works audio here says it's bad,' - well wheres the proof in that!? But apart from that if you use 3rd party plugins as 99% of people do anyway, and if you're writing electronic music with VSTi I guess there's not that much to complain about. So you could imagine 'growing up' with this DAW I copped a lot of crap from the pros saying it's a terrible program and the sound engine quality is shit etc and I should switch to Cubase or Logic to make it sound better, but I stuck with it and I'm glad I did because as my production techniques evolved so did FL, and today it is now a very complete and professional DAW and I don't feel so embarrassed about using it!Ī few things I will admit about FL Studio, the native plugins suck and to record say a band or something similar though it would be a tad clumsy. So I guess you could say It must be a good enough program to be accepted for commercial use, so why does it cop so much shit about being a 'noob' program?

I have released many tracks for commercial sale with it and toured as well.

So I've used FL Studio since I first began producing about 7 years ago and still use it to this day.

Fruity loops 5